Stellar (XLM) vs. TRON (TRX)McCaleb wasn't necessarily comparing the two projects, hand-for-hand. Considering Stellar is a more centralized project, and TRON is decentralized focusing specifically on dApps. The Stellar (XLM) co-founder was asked about the general 'temperature' in the crypto industry now and what he took away from the past few years. McCaleb states that he was amazed by how "hype-driven" the industry has become. "The allocation of capital and resources is wild to watch, when these projects that have zero technical merit get millions of dollars," McCaleb explained. McCaleb continued:
"It seems like a big shame. Hopefully, that will start to change. One of the nice things that comes with the market calming down—I still say it’s not a bear market—it means there’s less of that. Ninety percent of these projects are B.S. I’m looking forward to that changing. Things like Tron, it’s just garbage. But people dump tons of money into it, these things that just do not technically work."Ouch. >> Dark Overlord: Hacker Group Demands Bitcoin or 9/11 "Truth" Comes Out There was no way TRON (TRX) enthusiasts were going to let that one slide. Some even went as far as compiling the transaction figures comparing TRON and Stellar. https://twitter.com/mishalederman/status/1080020264518324226 Even TRON's founder, Justin Sun, responded to reports of McCaleb's interview. https://twitter.com/justinsuntron/status/1080171111256444928 No matter what project you prefer, the transaction numbers don't lie. TRON (TRX) is completing far more transactions than Stellar (XLM). On the flip side to combat Sun's point, applications can be built on top of the Stellar Network. While they aren't decentralized, the network can be utilized for much more than just monetary transactions. To compare the two projects fundamentally would be silly, as they are built entirely different and built for different things. Whether they're both functional or not is another story.